Tarnation! I made a very thoughtless, erasing and easily avoidable mistake (not that it wouldn’t be just as bad if it were more difficult to avoid) and I’m really really sorry. Thank you so much for pointing it out.

In a somewhat similar vein, it occurred to me that many bisexual/pansexual and gay men might identify with the letter(s) in question (to a varying degree).

Ah, variety. It makes things more spicy, but also more complicated

Thank you.

1) I looooove Tiger Beatdown
2) I have a very, very strong dislike for heternormativity
3) I am a bisexual/pansexual and 100% queer woman
4) The hyperbole, as Amadi said, was hurtful and othering, and I thank her and Astraea for pointing it out and asking for it to be edited to be more inclusive
4) However, I also feel that saying that references to women liking men are only applicable to straight women, and the need for references to women liking women is important to include/validate the experiences (only) of lesbians, erases my experience/existence, and contributes to bisexual invisibility. That is to say, women liking men is not always a “heterosexual experience”, and it is important (in general) to mention the fact that some women like women so as to include/validate the experiences of both lesbian and bisexual/pansexual women
5) Thanks for the edit, Sady – I think it actually makes it funnier