Skip to content

Tiger Beatdown Entertainment Presents: MOMMY ISSUES, A Comedy in Two Bros

Hey, guess who is making another movie? Did you guess “that one ‘The Hangover’ dude?”

Yeah, no, me neither. I try not to think about that one dude too much, as it happens! But he is making another movie, in fact. It is called “Due Date!” The synopsis, according to IMDB, is this: “A high-strung father-to-be is forced to hitch a ride with a college slacker on a road trip in order to make it to his child’s birth on time.” Doesn’t that sound fun?

Now, I know that since this movie is in “post-production,” Todd Phillips (AKA That One ‘The Hangover’ Dude) probably has a “script” or a “screenplay” or at the very least a “loose-leaf binder filled with crayon drawings outlining the plot” for this movie. But, you know, just in case he doesn’t, I thought I would write him one! And today, I am giving you a very special sneak preview.

SCENE 1.

HIGH-STRUNG FATHER-TO-BE: Oh, my God! The woman I have impregnated is about to have a baby! I’ve got to get across the country in time to witness the child’s birth! Will you help me, College Slacker on a Road Trip?

COLLEGE SLACKER: Ha ha, I bet your girlfriend has a vagina.

SCENE 2.

SLACKER: So, your girlfriend is going to push a baby out of her vagina. The same vagina you put your penis into. It’s like, her vagina isn’t just for you to put your penis into any more. You’re sharing the vagina. Is that weird for you?

HIGH-STRUNG: Of course not! I’m an adult!

[HIGH-STRUNG stares off into space, pensively.]

SLACKER: Hey, that gas station pump totally looks like a dick.

(Continued)

VERY IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT: This Week, In Fortuitous Assignments

You guys, guess who got asked to review that “Valentine’s Day” movie? For the Guardian?

It is possible that Valentine’s Day is a very high-calibre art film, like L’Age D’or,* in which the goal was for the viewer to viscerally feel that his or her own eyeball had been slit open with a razor (an experience which Valentine’s Day conveys far more effectively than L’Age D’Or), or an experiment along the lines that Andy Warhol conducted in the 1970s, by simply filming the Empire State Building for hours in order to test the limits of viewer boredom, and to bring the viewer to a place beyond boredom, a place of transcendence. Valentine’s Day is in fact very boring – it is over two hours long; my companion and I started to whisper “This has got to be almost over, I think” at about the 45 minute mark – but it does not bring transcendence. It brings existential nausea and deep despair.

The cumulative effect of Valentine’s Day is to make you feel that all human emotions are shameful. Have you ever been sad about a break-up? Had a crush on someone? Wanted your ex-lover back? Been happy to meet somebody promising? Wanted to have sex? You are terrible. You are feeling the same emotions portrayed in the movie Valentine’s Day. And these emotions, Valentine’s Day confirms, are cheap, and disgusting. For they make you like the characters in this movie. They make you a part of the target audience of this movie. They are why there is a movie in which all of the characters dress in red and pink and there are heart-shaped objects everywhere and gigantic teddy bears holding gigantic stuffed satin hearts and the words “Valentine’s Day” are repeated in every single scene and there are so, so many bouquets of roses. If we did not have these emotions, we humans, Valentine’s Day would not exist. That is why these emotions are wrong.

Another thing that Valentine’s Day will make you ashamed of is your politics. Valentine’s Day is very adamant that Valentine’s Day is a movie about every single human experience. Accordingly, there are gay characters. There is a gay football player who comes out of the closet. He is remarkable not for being gay, but for being played by an actor who delivers every line as if he is Clint Eastwood on Klonopin. It is revealed, very late in the movie and in a single shot, that he is dating a character played by Bradley Cooper. This is played as a shocking reveal: we see a man walking through the door with flowers, we do not see his face, there is a pan, and – surprise! Here is Bradley Cooper! This got the biggest reaction out of the audience, in my own personal experience of seeing the movie Valentine’s Day. The reaction it got was derisive hooting and manic laughter and someone shouting “Oh, no” and also many screams of disgust. I saw this movie in Ohio, a place I have considered moving back to because it is where I grew up. If anyone ever asks me why I moved out of Ohio, or why I will not move back there, the answer will be that I saw Valentine’s Day.

You guys, I was NOT SYMPATHETIC TO THIS FILM. Also: we haven’t even gotten to the parts with Taylor Swift!

*(Also, WHOOPS. Un Chien Andalou, in fact, is the Bunuel we are thinking of. But, people: I just saw Valentine’s Day. It’s a wonder I maintain any higher brain function. It is a wonder I AM ALIVE.)

All My Break-Up Songs

[Well, here it is: V-Day, the big terror. It is an indisputable fact that if everything is okay, you don’t even care about this holiday all that much. And it is an indisputable fact that if everything is not okay, you will wake up filled with fear and loathing, and every disgusting teddy bear holding a heart in the Duane Reade will feel like someone stabbing you directly in the face. That is why Valentine’s Day is so great: it is an obligation at best and a terror at worst. But, you know what? Today is not just That Awful Day. Today is the conclusion of Break-Up Music Week at Tiger Beatdown. We’ve been hanging out and we’ve been listening to our music all week long. But today’s special guest star, Elizabeth Seward, has a relationship to music that far exceeds listening.]

“Human beings have been falling in love and pairing off since there were human beings,” my boyfriend told me last night.  And while he is right — love is part of humanity — a broken heart is a part of it just the same. My boyfriend and I will spend Valentine’s Day this year together. But we spent Valentine’s Day together last year, too — holding each other and dishing out comfort over the ones who’d just broken our respective fragile hearts.  He was a friend of my roommate and we’d invited him to stay at our house during his break up.  I was lost in my own emotional black hole of a world, confused and hurt from the guy I’d been dating.  Both being musicians, we managed to hone in on what brought us the most release during this time:  music.

Break up songs are important during a break up — especially if you’re writing them yourself.  During my heartbreak, I did the very same thing that I have been doing since I was 13 years old:  penned a bunch of anger-ridden lyrics and embarked on my music career more strongly than before, with testaments of my trials of the heart readily available to anyone who would listen. This man, who was not then my boyfriend, played back-up.

Fig. 1: And when you go home and write tonight, you’ll write it better than this. You’ll make it so much more beautiful than it actually is.

And with that, I confess to you this: I have been accused of writing mostly man-hating break up songs more than once.  While I’m finally at a place where I can be inspired, with relief, by matters not intertwined with my love life, I regret nothing about the outlet music has always been and still is for me — especially during those dark and, gasp, lonely times.

(Continued)

Songs of Love and Hate, and Mascara

[Hey, do you have anything to do this weekend? Yeah. Exactly. Well, now you have something: you’re hanging out with all your friends at Tiger Beatdown Break-Up Music Week. We love you, and we want to play you all our favorite songs! Today, we will be learning about what comes after heartbreak, and why Leonard Cohen will always be there for you, with C.L. Minou.]

Introduction: Dance Me to the End of Love

We all know it’s almost never this easy :

And that ain’t so easy.

1. Stranger Song

It was probably inevitable that I would discover Leonard Cohen sometime close to when I actually did. I was already collecting singer-songwriters not exactly known for their, well, singing–I had several Neil Young albums, and within a few years I would be devouring Dylan as well.

It was the winter of my senior year in college, and I caught McCabe & Mrs Miller on TV one day, because I liked Robert Altman movies even back then. Altman did something accidental and special with that movie; maybe no other American movie has ever integrated its soundtrack so perfectly with its characters and plot. The songs wormed their way into my head and heart the way only Cohen songs seem to do, and stuck with me, and haunted me.

But that was all, at least for another few years.

(Continued)

The Magnetic Fields Are Not Surprised By Your Break-Up

[Normally, Sady and Amanda Hess have a little chat on Friday. During our very special Guest-Post Party / Most Appalling Fake Holiday Ever That Is Constantly Marketed At You / Break-Up Music Week, however, Sady is a bad conversationalist. Therefore, we will be reading a sexy and exciting guest post instead! You guys, guess who it is from?]

I have secretly wished for the fantastical break-up. I’ve dreamed of it like some girls dream of their wedding days: The naked woman in our bed, second family in Ohio, twisted web of lies, actually dating me to steal my credit card type of break-up. The surprise ending that gathers up all those little lies and slights and comments and suspicions that have accumulated in secret obsession under the relationship’s lovely surface and explodes them out into one big, glorious tribute, something that really validates all of that private suffering. You can spend an entire relationship just waiting for that moment.

Hardly anybody gets the Scooby Doo finale. The reality is always much more mundane, predictable, and frustratingly soft. There is no surprise villain on whom to pin all of your moral indignation. There is no moment of epiphany. Shit does not blow up. But we still check our watches as we wait for it to all go down. “The book of love is long and boring,” in the words of the Magnetic Fields, and the break-up is hinted at from the first page.

(Continued)

Mansplaining: On Breaking Up Under Pressure

[Oh, hey, guess what atrocities are coming up this week? I mean, aside from personal atrocities and all. Yes, in honor of all the various Valentine’s Day Massacres that are no doubt occurring as we speak, it’s Break-Up Music week at the Tiger Beatdown. Today’s guest post is by the lovely – and manly! – B. Michael.]

Break-up songs trade on a particularly gossamer-like, complex alchemy. To wit, one of my top-five break-up songs is Xiu Xiu’s cover of Queen’s “Under Pressure.”

Consider: I, a young, upbeatbeat heterosexual male am in love with a song authored by famously gay band Queen as interpreted by famously gay band Xiu Xiu (from an album named “Women As Lovers”) featuring the famously sad Michael Gira, whom I can’t stand on his own. The more interesting parts of the song — how some (relatively) slight dissonance serves to create by underlying the most beautifully melodic parts; the chiming guitar work reminiscent of U2; how that bass line, which is more of a punchline now, holds up as an enduring cultural artifact — these parts pale in the face of the most interesting thing about the song: “Under Pressure,” as I understand it, sounds like a simpering break-up song couched in a plea for universal human empathy, but countenanced thus it serves only as an atavistic, selfish, decidedly unKierkegaardian denigration of love as such.

(Continued)

Sooner Or Later One of Us Must Know: In Defense of Bob Dylan

[Sady is going through some boy troubles. She has good timing. In honor of this, and of the Most Terrible Week of the Year, Tiger Beatdown will be here to hold your hand through the weekend, with a star-studded series of posts on break-up songs. Let’s hang out and hate this bullshit together, everybody.]

The heartbreak of an inveterately verbose asshole is a hard thing to understand. If, for example, I told you about my heartbreak! Who would believe me, or care, really? There is something about people who seem powerful only when they’re speaking – people who construct massive fortifications of verbiage and argument and rhetoric in order to safeguard themselves, who have the mastery of conscious thought that language implies so concretely down, who are so good at relaying their version of things that you doubt there can be any other – that prohibits empathy, though it may very well encourage identification. You might want to have that power, but you don’t necessarily want to be around it; there’s too much chance that you will wind up on its receiving end.

All of this is a way of telling you that, as a verbose asshole myself, when I break up with someone, the only music I can really listen to is Bob Dylan’s.

I know! I know! Dylan is, among other things, a gigantic douche on occasion; very specifically, he would seem to be a misogynist of the old school, a member of the Grand Old Boner Party, the sort of man who can only deal with women – at least rhetorically – if they are childlike and precious, or strangely exotic objects on which he looks with fear, admiration, and deep distrust. We can debate whether this is just something that happens in his writing, or whether it carries over into his life, but if you doubt that Bob is capable of shitty behavior to – well, to most people actually, but specifically to women, or that his shitty behavior to those women can be fairly predictably sexist, I suggest that you ask Joan Baez about it. Or just listen to that one song of hers, about how, when they were dating and she was promoting her relatively unknown boyfriend out of the goodness of her heart, giving his scrappy little nothing projects her own by-then-substantial cred, he used to casually insult her writing. My poetry was lousy, you said, the girl says; don’t let on that you knew me when I was hungry and it was your world, the boy says, the breakup still fresh and already glorying in the fact that he no longer has a more successful girlfriend.

It’s such a bullshit cop-out, that line; it’s a put-down disguised as a plea, a confession of vulnerability designed to hit precisely where it hurts. It’s a masterpiece of passive-aggression. It was your world; don’t let on that you knew me when. And yet, though the specific song in which that line happens – the one about the lady who does pretty much everything like a woman, except for break, which she does in a far more immature fashion – has been railed against by so many feminists, held up as an exemplar of Bob Dylan’s legendary lady issues, when it is literally true about you specifically, it doesn’t quite sting so much. Although it does sting. Your long-time curse hurts, but what’s worse is all this pain in here. I can’t stay in here. Ain’t it clear? These are some lines, assuming that you read the song as about you, that will suck the breath from your lungs. And they are human. You have no choice but to accept them, and to understand.

But tell me every key stroke doesn’t hit you with the force of a blow. Look at his turned back for me and tell me what it means. Tell me you don’t see the circles under that girl’s eyes.

(Continued)

TALES OF VINDICATION: Taylor Swift Edition

It is with great interest that I read this – very long! Info-graphic enabled! Other-graphic enabled! – piece in, I believe, “Autostraddle” (with which, I have to confess, I am not all that familiar) on the feminist and musical offensiveness of Taylor Swift. For example, I really enjoyed this passage:

I mean, she’s pretty clear in “Fifteen” — really the only song where Taylor has an actual female friend — that “Abigail gave everything she had to a boy, who changed his mind, and we both cried.”

I’ll spare you the time of listening to the song and give it to you straight: Abigail had sex with a boy, and later they broke up. That’s right. No marriage. She gave him all she had.

That’s right. All Abigail had was her hymen.

Songs like “Fifteen” dig up the ancient Puritan ideal that girls can only access power by confidently and heterosexually denying access to their pants.

I have but one petty complaint, which is: would it have killed you to throw up a cite? Given the truly Kanye levels of reaction to that one Bitch piece (which was all over! Everywhere! For months and months) where I said basically this thing, exactly, I really do want to receive my fair due for pioneering the public expression of massive feminist and personal irritation with that one little blond girl. Especially now that you can apparently do that without being told you hate kittens, apple pie, and Freedom.

But, you know, it’s entirely possible that this person didn’t read the piece! Scientists have informed me that the world does not actually revolve entirely around me, but rather around the orb we call “The Sun,” although I of course responded by excommunicating every single last one of them. HERETICS! Have they never seen the sun quite visibly rise above the earth each day? But, whatever, the point is, if the author didn’t read my Kanye moment (possible! Likely!) something much stranger has happened: contra every single person who showed up to tell me I was BUCK-WILD CRAZY for being irritated in this way, the very same irritation has been induced by the same stimulus in another human subject! Which, in turn, means, I may have been… what is the word we use for this? It is on the tip of my tongue… ah, yes: RIGHT.

It’s rude and immature to say “I told you so.” So, I will simply say: IN YOUR FACE, EVERYBODY.

Great piece, though. Oh, hey, and the graphics!

madonna-whore

META-POST: Nobody Puts Sady’s Merchandising Skills In A Corner

Say, who’s spending too much time on the Internet lately? Me, that’s who! I have been spending too much time on the Internet lately! It is making me doubt my own cred as a socially functional person, I will tell you that much for sure. HOWEVER. One of the things I have been doing lately, when I am on the Internet, is getting involved in the stuff that I should have been getting involved with all along, such as:

WEBSITE REDESIGN!

Yes, this is an updatey post, about changes you will be seeing (hopefully) in the near future. Website Redesign, it turns out, is one of those changes! For example:

  • As it turns out, C.L. has a working knowledge of templatey stuff, which I personally do not – I manage to fuck things up every time I edit the template, to such a degree that I am always surprised when the computer does not spontaneously burst into flames as a result of my meddling – so, hopefully, at some point in the future, you will be getting an overhaul visually and in terms of certain website content.
  • Also, Tiger Beatdown is terminally ugly. But we do have a header, designed by a top-secret ladyblogging friend several months ago, which is gorgeous and hilarious and also, I think, might get us sued. So, hopefully you’ll be getting that, and a slightly more attractive and colorful, less wall-of-text Tiger Beatdown experience fairly soon. Another thing you might be seeing is ads! Which leads us to:

MONEY STUFF!

I consider myself one of the more fortunate ladies in the world, because people who read this blog continually straight up ask me for the opportunity to give me money. As you may have guessed, I make my living right now by freelance writing; as you may also have guessed, my primary commitment right now is to writing and editing Tiger Beatdown; as you may have guessed thirdly, I don’t get any compensation for that. Which is problematic, because it is more or less a full-time job. So, in this new chapter of the blockbuster saga Sady Doyle and the Quest for a Living Wage, I will in fact be looking into ways of making Tiger Beatdown sustainable, and “monetizing” (ugh) is a part of that. Just remember, it was your idea!

  • I’m looking into ad networks; specifically, I’m looking for ad networks that will help make this site financially viable and also have something to do with Interests That Are Relevant To Our Readers. Which is, like, the definition of “Looking Into Ad Networks,” but whatever. I’ve submitted the site for consideration to some folks already, but if you care to advertise here, tigerbeatdown@gmail.com is a good answer for you.
  • People have asked to “donate” through PayPal – one super-neat dude, by the name of William (hi, William! Thank you, William!) even found my PayPal account out of nowhere and sent me a chunk of change which, while good for about 3.5 okay dinners in the city of New York (or 1.5, if I decide to let my boyfriend eat too) was actually kind of startlingly large to me personally. I thank you for this, and for your interest! It feels strange to me, though, in that in order for this to be an actual “donation,” of the tax-deductible variety, I’d have to go and file for non-profit status, and until then it’s just people giving me money out of the goodness of their hearts. And I want people to get something concrete – increased exposure, or whatever – for their money! SO:
  • Remember how you were all asking for t-shirts and merchandise in that one comment section until it EXPLODED???? I am talking to some people about that, too! One of the people I am talking to about it is very gifted, and very Etsy-enabled, and she made me this cunning ensemble out of the goodness of her heart:

-6

Attractive, no? Except for my terminally weird facial expressions and the strangely chin-erasing lighting, I think so. And, while I do not think this specifically should be the merchandise, because making other people wear the tangible proof of my self-absorption is maybe a step too far, I do want you to know that hopefully we are going to have some t-shirts and they will be precisely this attractive, though not this very same one.  And finally:

  • If all other attempts to monetize fail, I will simply insert a dollar sign into my name, a la Ke$ha. Get ready for the reign of $ady Doyle, guys.

AND THERE’S MORE!

  • As you may have noticed, the blogroll is being updated. We’ll be including a bunch of new links soon. There are some that aren’t included because they belong neither under the heading of “Ladybusiness” or the “sometimes but not exclusively or perhaps not at all political but still they make me so happy I could cry” heading of “Other Business.” For example, Racialicious (which is up) and Questioning Transphobia (which isn’t yet) both have a focus on the ladybusiness, but that is not even remotely an apt or complete summary of what they cover, and I don’t know whether we need to create new categories for easy access (“Trans Business,” “Race Business,” etc.) or whether that runs the risk of fragmenting everything and pissing people off by feeling that they are being shunted off into some special category that they don’t think fully or accurately applies. It’s complicated, you guys! So feel free to share suggestions in the comment section.
  • Also, we are bringing on some new writers. This is so I can do other freelance work which actually pays me, without Tiger Beatdown going dark. Thus far, everyone who has been invited to write has been invited specifically by me. Pitches are exciting, though! Although I may not get the chance to respond to each and every one personally! Also, in the name of transparency, I have to tell you that I very much want to pay writers, but right now, I have to get to the point where writing, editing, comment-moderating and running the business end of this site is actually financially viable for me, rather than being an actual and heavy drain on me financially, which I can measure in lost time and income. Once I am actually earning something that approximates a living wage, I am telling you, I will get to paying writers, because writing is labor and deserves to be compensated. Right now though, the Tiger Beatdown Finances are not such that I can do a tremendous amount of that.

And that is that! So, hopefully this has been a very enlightening and non-boring post, which you can feel free to comment on with any number of demands, questions, and suggestions. Or it might be kind of boring. In which case you can just make fun of my hair, or whatever. That works, too.

Sexist Beatdown: All God’s Children Got Disingenuous Pandering Edition

Oh, that Sarah Palin. What an activist she be! For example, she has ACTIVELY forced me to think about her all week with her one damn Facebook post on Rahm Emanuel, which also happens to be the only thing I have read on Facebook for over a year, MOSTLY because I was tired of reading people’s political updates to the effect that Obama was a gay Communist Kenyan Muslim terrorist who wanted to force-abort their baby, which is what my Wall started to look like, and… yeah. Sarah Palin’s politics are just about coherent, thoughtful, and logical enough to be worthy of a Facebook post, is what I’m saying. But what a widely read Facebook post it was!

So, Palin is not pleased that Rahm Emanuel used the word “retarded” as a pejorative. She thinks he should be fired! FIRED RIGHT NOW! And I am not pleased with that word either, but I also know that a lot of people whose lives aren’t affected by cognitive disability haven’t even considered the political implications of “retarded,” so at least right now people are talking about it, and… oh. What’s that? Now people are rallying around “retarded” and defending it, partly because Sarah Palin led the charge against it? Great. Thank you, bad-word-defenders and/or Sarah Palin, this conversation is about to get super productive.

But, you know, maybe she could still do some good? We are all God’s Children, we all have untapped potential and the ability to reconsider our attitudes and at least a little capacity for empathy, we can all realize we’ve fucked up and get better, you guys, I believe in the possibility of human change. Maybe Palin could actually do some good, I am saying, if she also called out people on the right, and made the point that this grossness is widespread and worthy of re-evaluation. Like, maybe she could call out Rush Limbaugh for his use of the term! He’s not only politically active, he actively works to define the worldview of his many listeners, so his stance on and/or use of the term has way more potential to actively do harm than one White House official saying it in a closed-door meeting. And, I mean, I’m hearing that she did call Rush Limbaugh out, so… oh, WHAT?

Sarah Palin’s spokesperson is now accusing yours truly of trying to help the White House by quoting her criticizing Rush Limbaugh. She claims Palin opposes all uses of the word “retarded,” no matter who employs it.

Okay…so what? That includes Rush, right? This is beyond absurd. Here’s what happened: I asked the Palin camp for comment on Rush’s repeated use of the word “retard,” and her spokesperson emailed back that “Palin believes crude and demeaning name calling at the expense of others is disrespectful.”

Fuck me with a snow shovel. This is about to be the most counterproductive debate about language and disability that has ever occurred. And, I mean, I should have expected it, coming from a woman whose stance on disability frequently includes flat-out untruths, a woman about whom I am used to seeing headlines along the lines of “Palin: Obama’s ‘Death Panel’ Could Kill My Down Syndrome Baby,” but this is still somehow shocking, I guess because I am a vulnerable little flower child of a girl who still assumes that the vast majority of people mean well, and don’t actively intend harm, and I always get all “but how can this be” when I learn otherwise.

So, who’s not done talking about this? Amanda Hess of Washington City Paper’s The Sexist and I are not done talking about this! In this Palin-specific edition of Sexist Beatdown, we discuss the Sarah Palin Disability Record, what it means when someone insists a political statement is “not about politics,” the power of social media, how to use name-calling to destroy the American left, and how Sarah Palin’s devoted followers are taking heed of her message about not using disability language as a slur, and incorporating it into their own lives. Hint: it includes using slightly different language when insulting Rahm Emanuel by calling him developmentally disabled.

Progress, you guys. Fuck me solid.

trainwreck

ILLUSTRATION: It’s been a fun ride.

(Continued)