Skip to content

"I’m Her Mom." "No, She’s Not!" And Other Brief Diversions

Here is a thing you need to know about me, first of all: sometimes I do not answer my phone. Here is another thing: I love both baby animals and baby humans. My love for baby humans is kind of conditional – I think they are awesome up until about the age of twelve, at which point they become insufferable little weiners – but, nonetheless, deeply felt. I have, like, ten cousins, THAT I KNOW OF, not counting step-cousins and former step-cousins and my cousins from my dad’s six brothers and sisters, most of whom I’ve never met, and eight of my ten known cousins are younger than my own personal self, so you may rest assured that I have a lot of experience in the whole hanging-out-with-small-humans thing and feel pretty certain that it is (subjectively, at least) a rocking time. Now, you may think these two pieces of information are unrelated! They are not, however, and herein I hope to demonstrate why that is so.

Ladies, gentlemen: I present to you, “Kittens: Inspired by ‘Kittens.'”

As I watch this video, which is available on the YouTube and which I hope to aid in becoming the next big viral meme, I realize that it is very likely unbearable to a large sector of the adult population. This sector consists of people who (a) do not like kittens, or (b) do not like children. I even know some folks who dislike BOTH kittens AND children, which just seems like saying “no” to life to me, but I respect the fact that, were they to watch this video, they would fall out of their chairs while clawing frantically at their eyes to get the poison out. I am not one of those people!

Because kids will just do stuff like this. They know it’s kind of dorky, maybe. THEY DO NOT CARE. Much as I loathe the sort of parents who will tape their child and put him or her on the YouTube, taking care to include some nods to Wes Anderson in terms of frame composition because they are dicks (your child has a fake tattoo? Or is it real? Is your child JUST THAT COOL?) I must respect this particular effort because: “I want pie! I want beef jerky!” Dude, that is exactly what those kittens are thinking, how does she know? So, this is maybe why I am more cool with baby animals and humans than others, because, those times when I do not answer my phone? This is exactly what I am doing. I just thought you should know.

No-One On The Corner Has Swagger Like Us; Nor Are They As Pregnant: A Post About Celebrity Fashion

Here we are, folks, deep in the heart of February. Its cruel torments continue unabated; even the weather – the fabulous springlike weather, the golden sunbeams and fair breezes that have imbued me with an irrational conviction that cartoon birds are about to swoop down onto my shoulder and start chirping merrily at my face – feels like a tease, the Good Cop that tells you to relax and that he wants to help you right before Bad Cop starts yelling.

One side effect of February is that I cannot find anything to say! This whole “writing” thing, this process whereby one arranges words into a rational order, punctuated with, I don’t know, colons or something: whatever. Why bother?

But wait, did you hear that M.I.A. wore a dress?

Yes! A dress! You can find a photo of it right here, in this very blog post! It looks kind of crazy, just like everything else M.I.A. has ever worn, ever. Yet this dress: it is different. It is important. For, you see, M.I.A. is totally prego (or was, when she wore it – probably she has a baby now) and is therefore called upon to represent the sacredness of motherhood in all she does. What does this dress mean for the delicate flower of woman’s virtue?

#1. The Old People

You can find one answer at Slate’s XX blog, where someone’s cranky grandma broke in and started posting under the name of “Marjorie Valbrun“:

The imagery of a scantily-clad, or should I say scandalously-clad, pregnant young women dancing on stage with a bunch of male rappers whose rhymes sometimes debase women, was just too much for me. And don’t even get me started on what this cringe-worthy antic might say to impressionable teenage girl fans… someone, anyone, should have pulled her aside before she went on stage and simply said NO! You can’t wear that outfit. Please don’t wear that outfit. If she has a fashion consultant that person should be promptly fired and run out of town. The British designer who came up with the polka-dotted creation should be fired too… I’d still rather [be torn apart by wolves or something, essentially] than see my half-dressed mother dancing onstage before a television audience of millions, while carrying me in her womb no less, acting like she has no sense.

Then all the other ladies on the blog started yelling at Marjorie Valbrun, like, “Grandma! No! Don’t you know not to post without your medicine? President Hoover is not even alive any more, Grandma, he can’t answer your letters,” and she drew upon all the strength in her nine-thousand-year-old bones, and retorted, like so:

I don’t think dressing in clothing—pregnant or not—that leaves little to the imagination is empowering or radically feminist… She would have been just as effective performing with those men while wearing a suit—albeit a suit that proudly accommodates the protruding stomach—and even more so a dress.

“Something modest, with a nice high neckline, that makes her look like a young lady, and why are all these young girls showing off their ankles these days? In my day, we made a man work for it,” Marjorie Valbrun did not add.


#2. The Slightly Less Old People

Over at Hipster Runoff, meanwhile, there is a hilarious assortment of jokes about domestic violence and (the female half of) the cast of “He’s Just Not That Into You” being skanks who should be the targets of domestic violence (hahaha, “Chris Brown’s Pimp Hand,” ohhhh, that’s a good one, did you hear he choked his girlfriend until she lost consciousness and there was a 911 call that was basically just the sound of her screaming for her life? “Chris Brown’s Pimp Hand”! Because he’s black, like a pimp would be, and beats women! Ha!) and oh! The dress! On M.I.A., and also on a younger, skinnier, white, non-pregnant model. Twice. Which one looks better, yall? Could it be the person who conforms in every way to our currently accepted beauty standard?

Now, Carles might be satirizing racism and sexism; he might be satirizing the way white kids pat themselves on the back for liking M.I.A. because she’s brown and cool, just like their brown friends would be if they had any; he might just be upset because M.I.A. criticizes American imperialism and capitalism while taking money from enormous corporations, and might therefore feel the need to make fun of anything or everything about her. Who knows? One of my fondest dreams is that the ever-mysterious Carles will turn out to be an Asian (or “AZN“) woman who is running this shit up the flagpole as a demonstration of how certain kids will just embrace racism and sexism uncritically if it’s positioned as “ironic” and cool, but I have a little less faith in that than I used to; Carles the writer, via “Carles” the character, just satirizes everything and refuses to give a shit about anything, and is just as likely to make a racist or sexist joke as he is to make a joke about racism or sexism, which, if my life experience is any indicator, is just the last resort of someone determined to be cool at any cost. If you believe in something whole-heartedly, regardless of whether or not it’s in style, someone is eventually going to laugh at you; if you can’t deal with being laughed at, the logical next step is to give up your beliefs. You know, sell out. If, that is, you had anything to sell in the first place – if you aren’t just dealing more played-out Gavin McInnes bullshit, more “outrageous” racist sexist gay jokes from a (probably) straight white boy who can afford to be tickled by these incredibly hurtful and scary and potentially lethal things because racism and sexism and the oppression of gay people actually benefit him in every possible way.

On that tip: hey, here’s an awesomely post-racial, post-gender, post-it’s-not-cool-to-use-“faggot”-as-an-insult commenter!

hate entry level rihanna wanabes… who said she was alt? its almost the same as all the kanye peen suckers on his blog who praise him for finding shit on stumbleupon.com they will soon be on their way here large influx of kanyefggts and rihannawhores.. atleast the rihannawhores while know how to take a beating.

Yep, someone liking overtly commercial music and subsequently finding out about a website you like: way more troubling than domestic violence. Thank God he gets the satire! But what does this mean for M.I.A.’s dress?

#3. The Me People

Allow me to begin by dropping some knowledge on your face. M.I.A. is (a) a woman, (b) a South Asian woman, (c) a South Asian woman who is a celebrity, and (d) a famous South Asian woman who is pregnant and/or someone’s mom. Basically, all of these things mean that her body is constantly subject to criticism and comment from people she may or may not give a shit about! Including me.

Here is how that plays out, inevitably, not just for M.I.A. but for anyone who is anywhere near her position: while some douchebags are carping about how she’s sexualizing herself (which women, and especially women of color, are constantly told is the worst imaginable sin) and, even worse, sexualizing herself while pregnant (because pregnant women should never be seen as sexual, because pregnancy is in no way the result of sexual attraction or actual fucking; babies happen because God whispers happy thoughts into your vagina), still other douchebags are complaining about how she’s not sexualizing herself enough, how female celebrities should be fuckable but they don’t necessarily want to fuck her because she’s fat and not blonde and preggers and runs off at the mouth, and couldn’t she do something about that? This would be a good starting point for a conversation about conflicting expectations placed on ladies and how no-one can ever fulfill them! But whatever, that’s beside the point: all anyone wants to do is talk about her body.

So, while we’re all talking about M.I.A.’s pregnant body – and we have been for months, Jesus – she shows up, at a big fancy party, with pretty much all of it on display. Do you think she doesn’t know how to work the Google? Do you think she doesn’t get that we’re talking about it, that people are maybe more interested in her pregnancy than in her actual work? I am not a person who gets worked up about outfits – I barely know how to dress myself – but the dress, for whatever reason, made me laugh, because it was a big black-and-white polka-dotted Fuck You. There are big circular targets over her boobs and belly, for Christ’s sake. How do you not get that particular joke?

Yes, she still looks like M.I.A. – that is, totally crazy all the time – even while pregnant, and still does M.I.A. stuff like singing songs, and you know what? Great. Paying too much attention to celebrities is stupid, but while the culture at large is doing that, I like to know that at least one famous woman is not going all doe-eyed and demure and personality-free the instant a sperm hits one of her eggs. I hope she sells the baby pictures for ninety-seven million dollars and when they come out she and the kid are both dressed like neon-pink koala bears. That would be super.

So, yeah: if you can’t deal with a pregnant woman wearing a dress you did not personally choose, or with the fact that some people at the Grammys might actually be engaging in promotional activity intended to sell music (!!!) or with the fact that people, on the whole, become celebrities by showing up places and acting and/or looking wacky enough to notice, I have a solution: don’t watch the Grammys. Because, for Christ’s sake, this time next year I will be exactly this cranky, and exactly this prone to nonsensical tirades, and the last thing I want is for the news coverage to be dominated by another fucking dress.

You Are Going to Die Alone. Want Popcorn?

OMFG! Valentine’s Day is coming!!!!! Do you have a date yet? I do, because I am better than you. You are probably a sad, loveless old spinster who fritters away her precious childbearing years doing things like “working” and “making friends” and “discovering a cure for cancer.” Ha ha ha, you are pathetic.

No need to worry, though: even though you are a woman, and therefore totally suck until the precise moment that you meet a man who is willing to admit you might suck a little less than others of your kind, there is no need for you to be alone. You have the movies! Yes, for a mere $10 or $12 bucks a pop, you can haul your sad ass into a theater full of anonymous strangers to watch your narrative surrogates (who suck – just like you!) realize how awful they are and find sweet, sweet redemption at the hands of various blandly handsome men. They find love, these women! Just like you never will.

Now, I do not see these movies. God, no. I’ve seen some posters, though! So put down your Haagen-Dasz or whatever it is you dopes use to replace the sweet touch of a man, and listen up, for I am about to demonstrate my reviewing skills. This is why I get the big bucks, people! (SPOILER: No, it is not, I do this for free.)

#1:


Delightful! A quirky computer-animated romance about two stick figures who meet whilst posted on the doors of adjacent restrooms! It’s like WALL-E, but with more jokes about public urination. Oh, wait, I am totally wrong. Here’s the plot summary [via]:

A romantically challenged morning show producer (Heigl) is reluctantly embroiled in a series of outrageous tests by her chauvinistic correspondent (Butler) to prove his theories on relationships and help her find love. His clever ploys, however, lead to an unexpected result.

… he gets devoured by sharks?

No, no, that’s probably not it. They probably fall in loooove, despite/because of the fact that he is so adorably “chauvinistic” and treats her like a pile of dog poop that he somehow stepped in on the way to Hooters. Then she discovers that he is a dinosaur and has a secondary circulatory system in his hindquarters. Romance!

#2:

Terrifying! An innocent woman is accused of being a witch by the elders of her pastel village, and is condemned to be hung about with bags of expensive consumer products and thrown into the river! She screams, silently, from the poster – appealing to us, or to God, or to ANYONE, to spare her this agony. How did she come to meet this dark fate? Let’s check the plot summary:

In the glamorous world of New York City, Rebecca Bloomwood (ISLA FISHER) is a fun-loving girl who is really good at shopping – a little too good, perhaps. She dreams of working for her favorite fashion magazine, but can’t quite get her foot in the door – until ironically, she snags a job as an advice columnist for a financial magazine published by the same company. As her dreams are finally coming true, she goes to ever more hilarious and extreme efforts to keep her past from ruining her future.

Ah, women. Not only do they suck at love, they really, earnestly suck at having jobs. Imagine: a woman, writing, for a magazine that is not about fashion! Why, she’d be completely unqualified! Ho ho ho, what would she do, manipulate the keys of the laptop with her vagina? Turn in an article written entirely with her eyeliner pencil? This is a situation rife with comedic potential! All jokes aside, however, I can only hope that this confused young lady meets some sort of blandly handsome gentleman – her boss, I am thinking, or at the very least a more senior co-worker – who helps to set her priorities straight and teaches her that life is, yes, about more than shopping. It’s also about learning to give the perfect BJ.

#3.


Ah, the Brady Bunch: all grown up, still creepily trapped in alternate dimensions, from whence they can only stare at each other in an ultimately futile attempt at communication. Or, you know, not. Ultimately, this poster is so bland (that dude from Alias! That lady from Friends! Some other lady! That guy who is not John Hodgman!) that I can only turn to the plot summary – which, holy Jesus, is long:

Gigi just wants a man who says he’ll call – and does – while Alex advises her to stop sitting by the phone. Beth wonders if she should call it off after years of committed singlehood with her boyfriend, Neil, but he doesn’t think there’s a single thing wrong with their unmarried life. Janine’s not sure if she can trust her husband, Ben, who can’t quite trust himself around Anna. Anna can’t decide between the sexy married guy [the one from Alias! – Ed.] or her straightforward no-sparks standby, Conor, who can’t get over the fact that he can’t have her. And Mary, who’s found an entire network of loving, supportive men, just needs to find one who’s straight.

If you’ve ever sat by the phone wondering why he said he would call, but didn’t [you are a lousy lay – Ed.] or if you can’t figure out why she doesn’t want to sleep with you any more [you, also, are a lousy lay – Ed.] or why your relationship just isn’t going to the next level [you are both lousy lays, and why do you even try squishing your sad old privates together any more, seriously? – Ed.]… he (or she) is just not that into you.

There! Now all you wretched griping feminists can stop your wretched griping! He, OR SHE, is just not that into you. They’ve acknowledged that women may not all be ready to glom onto the first man who shows them the slightest bit of interest (in parentheses). They’ve indicated that women are at least partially responsible for the direction that their relationships take, and that boys are not the only ones who call the shots (in parentheses). They’ve positioned their movie as one which is not intended solely for female consumers and/or part of an industry in which rich old men greenlight sub-par entertainments for women based solely on their stereotypical and frankly insulting ideas of what women care about (in parentheses). If that is not part of the title – if, that is, the title indicates a movie that is only about women responding to male desire, rather than acknowledging that almost every single person on this planet attempts sexual relations with other people and will therefore necessarily experience some kind of rejection sooner or later, and also that women have desires of their own which are autonomous and not entirely dependent on those of men – that is only because it would be too hard to make that point (in parentheses)!

I see no problems with this movie. It will be delightful. It will teach us to laugh about love. It will have that dude from the Mac commercials, possibly in his altogether. Go see it. God knows you don’t have anything else going on.

SEXIST BEATDOWN: Now With Extra Palin!

Ladies, gentlemen: the Internet is a wondrous place. It can, for example, allow you to speak with people you like! It can deliver to you big chunky nuggets of Palin, for your consumption! It can totally break down and make Sexist Beatdown a little bit late, sorry.

However! It has arrived! THE SINGLE GREATEST AND MOST CULTURALLY RELEVANT CROSS-BLOGGING INTERNET EVENT OF ALL TIME, in which the insanely brilliant Amanda Hess of The Sexist and I speak about the ladybusiness of the day, has returned. In this installment: Sarah Palin still exists! And gets interviewed by Esquire! We shall therefore navigate the Proverbs of Palin, and determine whether or not they make any sense. (Spoiler: hahahahaha, Sarah Palin making sense, that’s a good one, hahahah, ugh, no).

Illustration: Sarah Palin’s personal brand

We had flutes and trombones around the house. For my siblings and me, music was important to give us some balance. If it weren’t for music, our entire social life, our avocations, all would have had to do with sports.

SADY: And so: she had flutes and trombones around her house. She was born to believe in the inherent goodness of flutes and trombones. Also, maybe, sports. With her love of music, it is a shame that the music she likes (“Barracuda,” for example) loathes her and wants her to go away. A tragedy, really, in the purest sense.

Everything I’ve ever needed to know I learned through sports.

AMANDA: Whatever.

Bored, anonymous, pathetic bloggers who lie annoy me.

SADY: This is interesting, because Sarah Palin strikes me as both bored and somewhat pathetic. Also, given the “palling around with terrorists” thing, kind of a liar! I will give her credit for not being anonymous, however. However much I WISH I had never heard the name of Sarah Palin, it will be engraved on my brain forever.

I’ll tell you, yesterday the Anchorage Daily News, they called again to ask—double-, triple-, quadruple-check—who is Trig’s real mom. And I said, Come on, are you kidding me? We’re gonna answer this? Do you not believe me or my doctor? And they said, No, it’s been quite cryptic the way that my son’s birth has been discussed. And I thought, Okay, more indication of continued problems in the world of journalism.

AMANDA: I love that Sarah Palin’s problem with journalists is that they attempt to check their facts, instead of spreading unsubstantiated rumors about major political candidates without confirming them. Still, I bet it is actually very annoying to have reporters calling you asking about your children and your children’s children. Still, I bet it is even more annoying to be Sarah Palin’s child and have your teen pregnancy and—surprise!—impending marriage outed to reporters days after your mother’s debut on the national stage. Thanks, mom.

Even hard news sources, credible news sources—the comment about, you can see Russia from Alaska. You can! You can see Russia from Alaska.

SADY: Sarah Palin, who is in NO WAY ANONYMOUS, I hasten to add, is very upset about the fact that people do not believe this to constitute foreign policy experience. She advises herself to “let it go,” presumably by bringing it up in every interview she ever gives for the rest of her life.

I would think we all tear up during the national anthem at the beginning of a baseball game, don’t we? That’s an alikeness between Alaskans and New Yorkers.

AMANDA: Most New Yorkers would call that a simple “likeness,” but, yeah, I bet most New Yorkers couldn’t find any more substantial ground with Sarah Palin, either.

If I were giving advice to myself back on the day my candidacy was announced, I’d say, Tell the campaign that you’ll be callin’ some of the shots. Don’t just assume that they know you well enough to make all your decisions for ya.

SADY: This, I… weirdly agree with? I mean, the Vice-Presidential candidate is usually given more chances to explain or prove herself than Sarah Palin got due to the McCain freakout and lockdown. I don’t know that all of her choices would have been wise, necessarily, but it does strike me as sexist that she was shut off from the public in that way. I get the sense she was deployed to bring in certain demographics, rather than given a chance to participate fully in the campaign. Boo!

Maybe it’s like when someone says, “I love you, you’re perfect the way y’are, now let me change you.” And I’m sure Senator McCain had to struggle with some of that, maybe early on in his campaign.

AMANDA: And now, my “wisdom” registry includes this horrible vision of John McCain telling Sarah Palin he loves her.

I’d been a fan of SNL for decades, and I have a lot of respect for the present talent. I knew it would be a good thing to be a part of. And also, of course, to let Americans know that I can laugh at myself, too.

SADY: Blah blah interview commonplace blah. Then Tina Fey may or may not have given her a mean look and Palin offered babysitting services and we all got to talk about “catfights” forever, the end.

My favorite place in Alaska is on a cold winter day in my own house, with fat snowflakes falling. In my nice warm home.

AMANDA: Does it count as “wisdom” to move to an area of the earth that is totally unfit for human habitation, then compensate by employing helicopters, snowmobiles, and probably your own personal oil rig to live there comfortably?

Illustration: Actual Palin

I eat, therefore I hunt. I want to fill my freezer with good, clean, healthy protein for my kids. That’s what I was raised on.

SADY: That and trombones! What’s weird in the hunting discussion is that she never mentions the effect on the environment. The whole frontierswoman schtick loses its charm when you realize she is killing things from helicopters while drinking white chocolate skinny mochas, which is not, I think, comparable to the hardships of the settlers. Then you start wondering whether it is really advisable to kill every living thing in your path just so you can have some chili.

A courageous person is anyone who loses a child and can still get out of bed in the morning.

AMANDA: Yeah, this one is a bummer. I can’t really disagree with this.

This is what I’ve been telling Bristol, before she gets married, is, Bristol, there are definitely gonna be tough parts in marriage. You have to look at those tough times and remember that you have essentially a business contract with this person. You’ve signed an agreement: You’re going to be together.

SADY: This is ominous and terrifying for so many reasons, chief among which is that Palin seems to think a slip-up in birth control is a legally binding contract which condemns one to an eternal and loveless marriage. There’s a difference between committing to someone and BEING COMMITTED to someone. I use “committed” in the “locked up in an institution with no hope of escape” sense, which is the feeling I would have were I to be forced into intimate domestic relations with Levi Johnston for a period longer than three weeks.

Fleece, lots of fleece, and skinny white-chocolate mochas. That’s the best way to stay warm.

AMANDA: Elitist.

Oh, yes, I pray. I talk to God every day. I’ve put my life, so I put my day, into God’s hands, and I just ask for guidance and wisdom and grace.

SADY: My mom does this too, so I can’t poke fun. Palin’s life actually has to be pretty hard, considering I get hurt when people point out I have barbecue sauce on my jeans; she’s got a lot to deal with, and I empathize. I don’t really trust a lot of Palin’s public statements, but this religion thing is one thing I’ve never questioned. Whether God should be her primary consultant on matters of policy, or is totally cool with charging people for their own rape kits: that, really, is another matter.

The secret to chili is you gotta have good mooseburger in there. I don’t know if you can get moose commercially in New York. You’d have to come up here and visit me in my home, and I’ll prepare it for ya.

AMANDA: Umm, actually, I would really, really love to eat Sarah Palin’s Secret Recipe Mooseburger Chili, The Secret Is The Mooseburger! I think there are real marketing opportunities here, especially in the most remote areas of the country, such as New York City, where moose access is severely limited.

Carmex. I’m addicted to Carmex. I don’t go anywhere without Carmex.

SADY: Also, Palin is addicted to Carmex. I did not know what Carmex was! Imagine my surprise when I Googled it, found its web page, and was subjected to a graphic with a confusing font describing a product that is either “Strawberry Tube” or “Strawberry Lube.” It is for your lips, Carmex! It is a lip balm. This is therefore irrelevant to my personal knowledge of Sarah Palin. Are you getting anything more interesting, Amanda?

The first place was an ice-cream store called Ferina’s, in Wasilla. In a fishing village called Dillingham, I worked waitin’ tables at a bar. Serving people, you learn patience. When someone’s mad at you ’cause you’re not serving them in the manner that they want to be served, and you’ve gotta be tempered and graceful.

AMANDA: Dude, I would not wish the fate of waiting tables at a bar in Dillingham upon any woman. I’m glad she got out of that, honestly, but I’m not sure that being “tempered and graceful” in a fish bar really translates to being tempered and graceful in a national campaign. I’m betting there’s a pretty low bar for “graceful” in a fish bar.

Two meanings in Bristol’s name: I worked at the Bristol Inn, and Todd grew up in Bristol Bay. But also, Bristol, Connecticut, is the home of ESPN. And when I was in high school, my desire was to be a sportscaster. ESPN was just kicking off, just getting off the ground, and I thought that’s what I was going to do in life, is be one of the first woman sportscasters. Until I learned that you’d have to move to Bristol, Connecticut. It was far away. So instead, I had a daughter and named her Bristol.

SADY: This, again, is enlightening. People do name their kids after things that have meaning to them. Sarah Palin is no different, even though the kids sound like their names were randomly generated by the Syllable-O-Matic 5000. The number of “Bristols” with significance in Palin’s life is kind of ominous, though. It’s like “The Number 23!”

Hot? If only people could see me as I come in from a run early in the morning without a trough full of makeup on, I think that they’d have a different opinion.

AMANDA: Okay, first of all, I think it’s really funny that she employs the phrase “trough full of makeup” here, because I think it’s really on-point. Second, I think a lot of people find it endearing when people lack a self-awareness about their own attractiveness. You know, “Oh, she doesn’t know how beautiful she is,” etc. The problem is that Sarah Palin lacks a self-awareness about seemingly everything, except for how much makeup she wears. A trough full!

After a long day, if the weather’s good, I like to take a long, hot run to unwind. Otherwise, lately, I take a bath with Trig, and I answer e-mails, and then we all fall asleep in my big bed while we listen to Piper read her Junie B. Jones books out loud. She’s learning to read and she’ll read for hours on end. It’s idyllic. It’s amazing.

SADY: So, she works out, and she spends time with her kids, and she answers her e-mail even at home. Those e-mails are the only real nod in her interview to the actual work she does, governing Alaska. Her private life and her domesticity and her motherhood and her praying, that’s what we hear about. Which is weird: if she believed she was qualified to be VP, shouldn’t she be more comfortable with discussing the actual stuff she does at work? Or would that be kind of unwomanly? Or is that all this interviewer wanted to know about, hot domestic Palin action? I get the sense that what we want from this woman is so paradoxical and weird that she herself doesn’t know how to make sense of it. I am feeling empathy for her! What is this? Damn you, Esquire!

I bite my lip when I’m tempted to wisecrack, because I’m always thinking of something that I’d love to say but know that I better not say it because of the position that I’m in.

AMANDA: Sarah Palin’s greatest problem may be how tragically calibrated her filter is for the shit coming out of her mouth. She won’t tell Katie Couric what newspaper she reads, but she’ll usher “palling around with terrorists” into the national discourse?

There is one America,
but there are different priorities reflected in individual Americans that certainly can stand in stark contrast with — I’ll give you an example. Some people, money is the be-all, end-all to them. Money and power, prestige, a title next to their name is the be-all, end-all. Other people, the highest priority would be their character, their reputation, their word, and money has nothing to do with that. The beauty of America is that individuals making up this great country do have different priorities. And that’s the contrast that I would point out.

SADY: True enough. And it’s easy to just photoshop someone’s head onto a bikini model holding a gun, just dismiss them that way: pretty girls are brainless, rural people are hicks, etcetera, that’s a nice little way to cordon off areas of experience you can’t engage with. I agree! Yet, there are a lot of things wrong with Sarah Palin’s policies, and we discussed them endlessly during the election, and the biggest one was that she never seemed to have any respect for “priorities” or perspectives that were not her own. Which, if you’re in the position to potentially run AMERICA, don’t you think you’d want to work for the common interests of all Americans, period?

We pulled out of some states that I believe we should have continued to campaign in and sent a stronger message that those states really mattered, regardless of the number of electoral votes there. The people mattered. I would have loved to have had more influence on where it was that we campaigned.

AMANDA: But Barack Obama is our president now and we don’t care about this.

Running is my sanity. Sweat is my sanity. And that was a frustration of mine on the campaign trail, when we couldn’t carve out a half an hour or an hour a day to run. The day never went as well as it would have had I had that time to go sweat.

SADY: Oh, dude. Not knowing the basics of your job, or being unable to demonstrate that you know those basics, is a problem that no amount of running can solve.

WHAT DOES SARA’S MOM THINK? A Feature which Is Long Overdue

Dude: my mom is the best. You may think I am only saying this because she is my mom! Yet that is only partially true. She is my mom, and should be applauded for that achievement, but is also an awesome lady – awesome to the extent that, whenever I find myself in a troubling situation, I get the urge to quote her like she is freaking Gandhi or something. Therefore, WHAT DOES SARA’S MOM THINK? is a feature which I believe will add to the sum total of human knowledge. 
This installment concerns literary matters, and also why I am such a huge narcissist! It goes as follows:
“You know, I took your advice, and I’ve been reading that David Foster Wallace. It’s really good!”
“Which book are you reading?” 
A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again? I like it a lot. I think the first essay went over my head, but I like all the rest of it, especially that one about the cruise ship, which I think is just hysterical.”
“Yeah, his non-fiction is some of the most fun to read. I can lend you Consider the Lobster, too, when you come up. But you’d have to skip the first essay, because it’s about, like, porn.” 
“Oh, what’s that, dear? We never had any of that in my day, which was the Seventies.”  
“Oh, all right, fine. I’m just trying to protect you!” 
“Well, that’s nice, honey. I have to say, though, I think you write just as well as he did.” 
“I’m going to go ahead and assume that’s true.” 

Right, Guys, Because of Gay?

Ah, the travails of modern life. On an almost daily basis, I am confronted with the fact that Amanda Marcotte is smarter and funnier than she has any right to be, most recently in her write-up of this poop:



And here she is:

I laughed out loud watching it, and then I felt angry about that, because the premise of the video is that I, due to the unfortunate act of nature that granted me a vagina, cannot either find this video funny nor find these cliches anything but compelling. Also, my vagina gives me a tin ear to the desires of the more intelligent, humorous sex who doesn’t want to waste their time with stupid movies that my vagina makes me want to watch… Being one of those new-fangled women who went to college instead of getting married at 20 so I could start pushing out babies for some evangelical Christian car salesman, I am, of course, not only a giant sap for romantic comedies that feed me a ridiculous fantasy that someone could ever love me despite my ambition and neuroses (which, being a single, educated woman, I have by the dozens), but I’m also a narcissist who can’t think of other options for viewing romantic comedies other than demanding my boyfriend suffer.

Oh, it’s all worth reading, sure, but wait for the conclusion:

I suppose a lot of women are going to choose not to be insulted by this video, thinking that if they think it’s funny, that makes them smart and funny. You know, just like a man and not at all like other women who suck so much. Those women are what we in the feminist industry like to call suckers.

SNAP.

But wait! Amanda! You missed something! All of these “romantic comedy” scenes are full of MEN. MEN, pretending to date and fall in love with and have the sexing with OTHER MEN. Which men can never do! Because that would make them total homos! And, they’re all, like, “ohhhhh, look at me, I’m having feelings of a romantic nature – but AM A MAN!” Hahaha, it’s like they’re women! And have the Gay! Oh, my knee is sore, from all the slapping. WOMEN! GAYS! Hahahahaha, ohhhhhhhhhh, we have fun.

BREAKING:

“It’s like a journal. The only difference is you hit ‘publish,’ and everyone gets to read it.”

Oh, if only we all had such journals! Journals… that were LIVE. Imagine it, my friends!

A Tale of Two Trampolines; Also, Vaginas


My goodness, reading the news is hard. All day, every day, I engage myself in the tedious and unprofitable business of news-reading, attempting to extricate some random series of coherent thoughts from it in order that I might bore you, the reader.

Sometimes, when I am reading the news, I read Jezebel, or Salon! Today, Rebecca Traister and the fine publications mentioned above have done me a service: they have provided an article about TMI(ASV) or, for the acronym-illiterate amongst us, Too Much Information (About Some Vagina).

Jezebel, the popular women’s offshoot of the Gawker empire, has been the leader of the oversharing crusade, with vibrant, aromatic and really graphic posts about everything from lodged tampons to yeast infection remedies to bloody period sex to female ejaculation… Other recent, mainstream expressions of the form have included Elle magazine’s brutal piece last summer by Miranda Purves, called “The Ring of Fire,” about how giving birth to her child tore her vagina asunder. An English translation of Charlotte Roche’s German bestseller “Wetlands” (“It is difficult to overstate the raunchiness of the novel,” read a story in the New York Times about “Wetlands,” “and hard to describe in a family newspaper”) is due in April. It opens with the sentence, “As far back as I can remember, I have had hemorrhoids.” And this month, a younger iteration of the lay-it-bare form: the publication of “My Little Red Book,” an anthology of more than 90 women’s stories of the first time they got their period.

Oh, thank God. Finally, I can stop trying to understand what happened with Tom Daschle (back taxes?) and get back to thinking about what all girls love to think about most: their periods!

Periods, as you may have heard, are scary and stinky and un-sexy and drive you clinically insane, which is why whenever you are angry with a dude you must be having one. They also, according to landmark feminist novel The Mists of Avalon, allow you to bewitch and kill a man with your dark magic. Yet chicks are writing about them now! Who would have thought?

Yep, chicks love period talk. They also love white leggings, or did in rural Indiana circa 1995, which is where I was vacationing when my two older female cousins decided to invite some boys (including one my age, for potential making-out purposes: his name was Chet, he had a trampoline) to their majestic rambling farmhouse so that we could watch Speed, and made me wear said white leggings so that I would not scare the boys away with my decidedly un-sexy pants. Oh, God, white leggings. Leggings, which were white, worn in the place of pants. Guys liked them! Or so my cousins explained. I went with it, but there was terror in my soul.

At that time, I had been having my period for a year, in Imaginationland, and also in the lies I told my cousins and any other girls who wanted to compare stats. In reality, I was thirteen, and periodless, and therefore convinced that I was a barren freak, a Benjamin-Button-style womanchild whose body would never reach the ripe flower of sexual maturity. The lies were meant to spare my family and friends the stark reality of my fate. Also, other girls kept talking about their periods, and I didn’t have one, and was jealous.

I got a stomachache while watching Speed. Whatever. Maybe I was caught up in the pulse-pounding action! Maybe I was nervous about sitting next to Chet! He had a trampoline, after all: would I ever see it? If I saw it, would we make out? How would that work? Was I, perhaps, sexually aroused by the prospect? Nobody had ever told me what getting turned on was supposed to feel like, just that you’d know it when it happened, which seemed like a cheat to me; at least boys got boners, like their penises waving “hi” and letting them know what was up, whereas I would just have to make out with people until I felt some thus-far-undefined sensation. Abdominal pain seemed as likely as anything else. Also, I’d heard there was moisture involved, and I was definitely starting to feel some of that going on in the old white leggings. Yep: I was turned on by Chet, I decided. We were going to do it. Probably on a trampoline. The prospect seemed less thrilling than one might hope.

As I pondered the inevitable and rapidly approaching loss of my virginity to Chet, I decided to get a Coke from the refrigerator. Did Chet want one, I inquired? He did. We’d been together for such a short time, and yet I had already demonstrated my essentially giving and generous nature. In our relationship, Chet would always have Coke. So I stood before him, ready to make the long walk to the refrigerator that had come to symbolize our love.

Now, Speed is a violent movie. People get blown up. Dennis Hopper is beheaded. This, at first, is what I thought Chet was reacting to, for the look of raw horror on his face was something I had never before seen in man or boy. You know that scene in The Shining, where the twins are like, “come play with us, Danny – come play with us forever,” and then they’re all bloodied, and then a tidal wave of blood gets aimed right at Danny’s face? Well, that was what my vagina had done to Chet.

“Ummm?” Chet squeaked at me, and then I looked down.

“Oh, that’s my period!” I said. My cousins’ eyes reached maximum censorious boggling width. One of them shook her head slightly, warning me off this disastrous course, as I proceeded to wow Chet by dropping some menstrual knowledge. “Well, it happens every month, you know! It’s totally natural, all girls my age have one. It just means that you can get pregnant! Well, I guess I’d better go put in a tampon now!”

Reader, I put in a tampon. And lo, I have been putting in tampons these many years since. Nor have I ever lost the sense of gratitude I had that day. I was not a freak. I did not have to sleep with Chet. Neither I nor anyone else would ever again be forced to wear those hideous white leggings. The thing that I had been fearing and coveting for two years had finally happened – and it didn’t hurt as much as I’d been told, it didn’t make me crazy, it wasn’t terrible or wonderful, it was so fundamentally unremarkable that I didn’t even know it had happened. Once upon a time, I had no period; now, I had a period. It didn’t change me. It was just there.

Which is why girls talk and write about it, often in a detailed and explicit way. It’s just there. Vaginas are not the mystical dictators of a woman’s inner experience; they just happen to be around. The shame or fear or worship of anything related to the vagina, the mystification and heaping of positive or negative values on it, is fundamentally silly, like being scared of your left ankle. TMI? Oh, spare me. There are nine million articles published daily about women’s skin and hair and teeth and noses and waistlines and upper arms and every other part of their bodies; assuming that the vag is the one unspeakable thing, or demanding that we always present it as a clean perfect man-pleasing baby-making machine, only contributes to women feeling estranged from their own experience.

There was only one regret I really had about the incident of the white leggings: I never got to see Chet’s trampoline. I rued that one for a while. Then, a year later, my family got one, and it was all OK.

The Weapon

Every now and again, I come on something that I feel I can’t even begin to address. Every now and then, I come on something that I have to address. This is both:

Samira Ahmed Jassim, 51, is accused of recruiting more than 80 women to become human bombs, including 28 who carried out attacks.

She has apparently confessed to helping to organise the rape of young women. She would then play on the shame associated with victims of rape in Iraqi society to convince the women to become suicide bombers as their only means of escape, according to a prison interview with the Associated Press.

What do you say to this? What can you say? Talking about the oppression of women within certain Muslim cultures, as a non-Muslim, American feminist, is always difficult: Islamophobia is such a real and huge and seething undercurrent in American society that any critique risks feeding into that. Specific criticisms of specific practices are co-opted and used to feed a vast and indiscriminate hatred of each and every Muslim person on the planet. I always think of the months after 9/11, and how, immediately following that attack, the vastly anti-feminist, anti-woman Bush administration began to repeat and distort feminist arguments about the plight of women under Taliban rule. As if they cared; as if they, or America in general, had any interest in working to assist Muslim feminists in resisting oppression prior to this sudden (feminist! liberating!) desire to kill thousands of Muslims.

I also think about how, when nations go to war, they project the worst within themselves onto the enemy, the Other: THEY hate women, THEY want world domination, THEY are allowing themselves to be guided by a blind, illogical, and oppressive fundamentalism. WE would never do that. It’s become steadily more customary for anti-feminists to attack American feminists by asking why we’re claiming to be oppressed, when Muslim women (all Muslim women, usually, in these arguments) clearly have it so much worse. As if the existence of misogyny within other nations precluded the existence of it within our own; as if blatant sexism precluded subtle sexism; as if one male-dominated culture (ours) could ever truly remedy male domination elsewhere. As if these very arguments were not sexist and did not erase the agency of Muslim women by failing to take note of Muslim feminists who work to resist their own oppression, and by framing sexism as a problem best solved by big strong American men with guns.

When I look at this, I see it within the context of history: rape has always been a weapon of war. When nations go to war, women are invariably raped. Americans, like their enemies, rape when they go to war. You’ve seen the photos from Abu Ghraib; no-one could miss the unavoidable message of sexual assault and humiliation, intended to “feminize” the prisoners, to destroy them in the same ways that women are destroyed. We have done worse. We have done it to our own. Here, as in the cases of Lavena Johnson and countless other American female soldiers, the crime comes from within rather than from the apparent enemy, but then, women are always treated as enemies within a culture intent on maintaining complete male domination. The only difference is that this was done to accomplish a specific military objective, rather than simply to ensure male domination within the culture, or for fun.

This situation does not arise from problems inherent to Islam, but problems inherent to misogyny, which made every single aspect of this situation possible. Women’s lives were appropriated, made use of, and discarded by an oppressive male regime. Women’s sexual autonomy, psychological health, and basic humanity were violated in order to advance the interests of a regime which views them as essentially worthless except insofar as they serve to achieve male goals. Samira Ahmed Jassim, a woman, achieved a position of security and power within a misogynist society that was only possible because she agreed to be complicit in the oppression of women, betraying sisterhood in the most fundamental way imaginable, keeping herself safe by selling other women out. None of this is unique, nor is it alien to someone who has spent any time studying male privilege and male domination. When I look at this, I see why it is necessary to oppose misogyny: not Muslims, not even the patriarchal oppression within some Muslim cultures, but male domination itself, at home and everywhere. It is never harmless; it can always, if unchecked, lead us to atrocities like this.

Because the only way to prevent crimes made possible by the oppression of women is to stop oppressing women:

Female suicide bombers have become a weapon of choice for al-Qaeda and other extremist groups in Iraq over the past year because they can more easily penetrate the defences of the increasingly competent Iraqi security forces.

They are able to bypass the many checkpoints across the country, which are typically manned by male guards, because social rules prevent men from frisking women.

To counter this loophole the authorities have been recruiting more policewomen and female guards, but they are still too few.

The more power women have within a society – the more education, professional presence, safety, autonomy, and authority we accord to women – the less power misogyny will have as a weapon intended to tear that culture and its people apart.

That’s it. That’s all. That’s the truth, no matter where you’re standing.

My Mom:

A) Enjoyed the sensitive folk-rock hits of the Seventies; also, Stevie Nicks.
B) Tried to raise me as a vegetarian and a person unconfined by traditional gender roles of generations past; was successful on one count.
C) Was really, really pretty. (Still is, in fact!)
D) Bought me this EFFING AWESOME SWIMSUIT.